Why don't they build a giant Solar Power Plant surrounded by the Nevada desert ?
What are your view on loop as...
because they will need that area for future casinoshow much liveliness is produced using solar...
"in danger of extinction species"Actually in attendance are multiple different ideas to use solar power , PV panels is one so also is using the heat directly to boil sea etc. There is another idea which talks of building solar power towers, its basically a huge tower next to turbine fans and air inlet at bottom and top. During daytime the hot air from bottom moves upwards and turns turbines to generate power, during nighttime the reverse happen. So effectively you get power as well as there is a huge greenhouse at foot which harbours lots of plants/agriculture. The scientist who has worked on this is from Srilanka and claims it could be the wonder power solution in deserts. the data are staggering but if it works this could be a miracle solution.
Is technology competent to build a twirl...
virtuous thinking!Best Answer: One problem beside your thinking (regarding the giant reservoir) - Nevada is the driest state in the United States. So where exactly, do you propose they get the hose to fill this giant reservoir? Groundwater pumped to the surface? That would only lower the groundwater tables contained by many areas - which will dry up natural springs, and will also impact farmers/ranchers in those remote areas of Nevada. I don't own a problem with your idea about the solar generate stations, but those do take huge amounts of land to make them viable ample to produce sufficient electricity. However, unless they use photovoltaics to produce electricity, they'll need water for the plant - and water is surrounded by short supply in Nevada (as I've already mentioned). If they're heating up a fluid to produce steam to run a steam turbine generator, they'll need cooling hose down for the condenser which will condense the steam back to usable water in their boilers.
How is solar heartiness produced?
Nevada already has satisfactory power plants including existing solar power plants & transmission losses through current wire power lines make it improbable to transmit power much over 200 miles from the source.What's the controversy next to Renewable Energy?
"They" are starting to build solar power plants in the desert: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_plants_in_the_Mojave_Desert I'm sure you'll see more and more of this as time goes on.Do you believe i enjoy design a...
The idea of storing get-up-and-go in water mass is an old one, but producing punch directly from solar energy is yet more expensive than from conventional sources, and storing it would make it more expensiveDoes Obama Figure You Can Use Solar...
The primary obsticals are cost and land use requirements: Solar power is not free, and is contained by fact, not even cheap. The cost of the necessary collectors, support equipement etc must eventually be amortized via a charge on the electricity generated. At the present time, using currently available technology, this cost exceeds the cost of conventional power equals. Large scale solar generating facilities require considerable arrive area, much more than conventional generation facilities. In auxiliary, solar facilities must be located in areas that are often ecologically fragile. The erection of such a massive system in such a fragile biome will result in significant ecological desecrate.can you explain surrounded by your own...
Nevada photovoltaic plants: http://www.lvrj.com/business/12586841.html http://www.solartoday.org/2007/mar_apr07/nevada_solar_one.htm Mesquite NV proposal: http://www.mesquiterenewables.com/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=14&Itemid=28 Nevada water is a precious commodity . . one political candidate proposal: http://www.campaignsitebuilder.com/templates/displayfiles/tmpl29.asp?SiteID=186&PageID=5543&Trial=falseWhat companies can I invest within that...
Gov build them? Worst idea ever. A corporation can do anything at almost half price as what a gov can. Solar panels are drastically expensive and don't really put out enough power to make them worthwhile. Yeah, they are earth friendly, but really! They should build nuclear power plants within the middle of nowhere. That way, if something happens, nobody will be around.Would the U.N. sponsor a competition between...
I saw an great documentary about what you are talking about. They be actually talking about areas close to Death Valley and the like. There is an opportunity for this into the future, but the cost effectiveness and technology is not within yet to make this a reality. Geothermal is something they are chitchat about also. It would work like a nuclear reactor, except the steam would be generated by pumping wet down into the earth several miles where temperatures obtain up to several hundred degrees and then the rising steam runs the turbines. There is a misconception that a nuclear plant creates nuclear energy for power. It in actual fact creates heat to make steam and thus run the turbines the same method.Related Questions: